نمایش نتایج: از شماره 1 تا 3 از مجموع 3
سپاس ها 2سپاس

موضوع: Redundant DHCP Server

  
  1. #1
    نام حقيقي: محمد حکیمی

    Administrator شناسه تصویری Hakimi
    تاریخ عضویت
    Dec 2002
    محل سکونت
    تهران
    نوشته
    6,549
    سپاسگزاری شده
    6798
    سپاسگزاری کرده
    1035
    نوشته های وبلاگ
    4

    Redundant DHCP Server


    Redundant DHCP Server

    There is no setting to make DHCP redundant, but you can build it so that
    there is a redundant configuration. Clustering is not recommended as it can
    run into problems on DCs/ DNS/ DHCP and there are enough configuration
    options built into the product to make that not needed.

    It will be tempting to build each DHCP server with half the scope but resist
    this. DHCP works by accepting whatever server responds first to the server
    location broadcast. If each has half of the DHCP range and it tries to renew
    with the wrong server, the workstation will get a NAK message.
    Unfortunately, the workstation may not always try again when it gets the NAK
    and will simply drop off the network. I like to call this NAK poisoning
    (though I am sure this is probably not my term)

    To get around this, have both servers host the whole range and have
    reciprocal exclusions so if the renewal is out of range, the server will
    offer a substitute address rather than a NAK.

    Example on a 192.168.1.0/24 network
    Server 1: 192.168.1.0/24 range excludes 192.168.1.129-254
    Server 2. 192.168.1.0/24 range excludes 192.168.1.1-128

    Note that this is 50/50... Note that normal distribution is 80/20 here the
    80 can handle the entire required number of hosts. Just remember if you're
    going to split the servers across a routed boundary to include an IP
    Helper-Address (on Cisco)command to allow foreign solicitations. The local
    one will almost always respond first unless it is down.

    Hope this helps.





    موضوعات مشابه:
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! و almas455 سپاسگزاری کرده‌اند.

  2. #2
    نام حقيقي: Alireza Khosravi

    عضو عادی شناسه تصویری irarkh
    تاریخ عضویت
    Jun 2005
    محل سکونت
    Tehran
    نوشته
    753
    سپاسگزاری شده
    79
    سپاسگزاری کرده
    21
    .The 80/20 Rule is the one state solution for DHCP Redundant Policy




  3. #3
    نام حقيقي: محمد حکیمی

    Administrator شناسه تصویری Hakimi
    تاریخ عضویت
    Dec 2002
    محل سکونت
    تهران
    نوشته
    6,549
    سپاسگزاری شده
    6798
    سپاسگزاری کرده
    1035
    نوشته های وبلاگ
    4
    That holds true unless it takes longer than a few hours to get your failed DHCP server working again (for example, if it fails just after working hours and your network monitoring software fails to beep you on your pager). Or unless you've configured leases shorter than three days because your network is a classroom, a conference facility, or has a lot of mobile users who connect to it remotely. Because of considerations like these, many network administrators prefer a more conservative 50/50 rule, which actually works even better in a single subnet environment anyway, provided both servers have enough addresses scoped to cover the needs of all the clients on the network. Then if one server goes down, the other one can take up the slack for as long as it takes to get the first one up and running again.




کلمات کلیدی در جستجوها:

هیچ کلمه ای ثبت نشده است.

برچسب برای این موضوع

مجوز های ارسال و ویرایش

  • شما نمی توانید موضوع جدید ارسال کنید
  • شما نمی توانید به پست ها پاسخ دهید
  • شما نمی توانید فایل پیوست ضمیمه کنید
  • شما نمی توانید پست های خود را ویرایش کنید
  •